Case library  /  What happens after discipline

Four ways to violate probation, and one of them is not paying

In short

License revoked

$4,530

Including failure to pay the cost recovery from the original order.

License typeLMFT
EffectiveDecember 19, 2024
Case number2002024002031
Why this case is here

One of the four ways to violate probation is simply not paying the bill from the first order.

What happened

The original discipline rested on a conviction under §4982(a), a dishonest act under §4982(j) — concealing damage to a rental car with body filler — and §4982(e) with 16 CCR §1845 for never answering a Board inquiry.

The petition to revoke probation alleged four separate failures: not completing the ordered psychological evaluation; not obeying all laws; not submitting quarterly reports; and not paying the cost recovery.

On the obey-all-laws condition, police responded to his office, where he was screaming. He had been living in the office, had confronted his landlord with an axe, and refused officers' orders.

What it was charged as

Probation Condition 1

Failure to complete the ordered psychological evaluation.

Probation Condition 6

Failure to obey all laws.

Probation Condition 7

Failure to submit quarterly reports.

Probation Condition 21

Failure to pay cost recovery.

The outcome

License revoked.

OAH No. 2020120643

$4,530ordered in cost recovery under B&P §125.3

What the rule actually says

Cost recovery is a probation condition, which means not paying it is a violation of probation and an independent ground to revoke. B&P §125.3 lets an administrative law judge order a licensee to pay the reasonable costs of investigating and enforcing the case, including the Attorney General's charges. The judge may reduce or eliminate the amount but cannot increase it beyond the certified cost statement.

Discussion

Analysis, not part of the decision

The petition to revoke probation alleged four failures: not completing the ordered psychological evaluation, not obeying all laws, not submitting quarterly reports, and not paying the cost recovery. Only the second of those involves anything anyone would recognize as misconduct. The other three are administrative, and any one of them is enough.

Cost recovery is a probation condition. That single structural fact changes what it is: not a debt that can be carried and negotiated in the ordinary way, but an obligation whose breach is independent grounds to revoke the license. Section 125.3 lets the administrative law judge order the reasonable costs of investigation and enforcement including the Attorney General's charges; the judge may reduce or eliminate the amount but cannot increase it beyond the certified cost statement.

The obey-all-laws condition is what it sounds like. Police responded to his office, where he was screaming; he had been living there, had confronted his landlord with an axe, and refused officers' orders. The condition converts conduct that might otherwise never reach the Board into a probation violation immediately.

Where insurance reaches, and where it does not

Cost recovery is not a defense cost and no sublimit pays it. This is the number to plan for: in this dataset it runs from $882 for a single settled DUI to $15,883 for a contested sexual misconduct case, and it is separate from your own lawyer.

Compare what each program actually covers →

What would have changed it

  • If you cannot pay the cost recovery, negotiate a payment schedule into the order at the settlement stage. It is far easier than responding to a petition to revoke.
  • File the quarterly reports even in quarters where nothing happened. Missing them is the most common single probation violation in the data.

Questions

For a law and ethics seminar, or for yourself

  1. Read the fifteen standard probation conditions. Which three would be hardest for a solo practitioner to satisfy, and why?
  2. Cost recovery is a condition rather than a debt. What practical difference does that make to someone who cannot pay?
  3. Should inability to pay be a defense to this kind of violation? Argue it.

Source. This write-up is drawn from the signed public decision in the case number above. Names, cities and employers have been removed — why. To pull the original, open the Board's quarterly newsletter archive, find the issue covering December 19, 2024, and match the case number in the Formal Disciplinary Actions section. Not legal advice.

Figures checked, narrative not re-read

The numbers are current. The argument around them has not been reviewed since it was written.

You should not have to work this part out on your own.

Once a month: free tools and apps worth having, better ways to run the admin side of a practice, what other California therapists are actually doing, and anything new here that might save you an afternoon.

About monthly. One click to leave. Never sold, never shared. The consent box is separate and unticked because California requires it — and because it should be.